Friday, 6 April 2018

Language Lab review

                                               


What is Language lab?

A room Equipped with audio and visual equipment to aid people learning a foreign language. Language lab majorly favors the Audio – lingual method, it stressed listening and speaking more than readin and writing skills. The original language labs are now very outdated. They were using tapes based system using reel or cassette.

History of Language Lab:

Ralf Waltz is usually credited with cong the term language laboratory .The History of the American Language laboratory can be divided into five periods,

(1) The beginning period, before World War 2

(2) The Establishing period, until 1958 when the national defense education Act(NDEA), which supplied large amounts of money for education, was passed

(3) The developing period, until the end of the 1960’s

(4) The diminishing period, until the end of the 1970’s and,

(5) The revival period, until today.

Language laboratories have become practical use since around 1950. Edison’s tin foil phonograph, invented in 1877, is the origin of our deluxe language laboratories with all their complex equipment. Edison’s phonograph was used in a foreign language class for the first time at college of Milwaukee n 1891.

Rafael Diez de la Cortina thought the method of teaching a foreign language using a phonograph for the first time. (Kitao) Unquestionably the 1960s were the golden years of language laboratory. According to Hocking by 1962 there were approximately 5000 installation in secondary schools another 1000 secondary school had labs by 1964.

Advantages of Language Lab:

· It is self assisted learning; student is in the center of the learning process.

· Possible to listen to many speakers

· Not to hear other student’s bad pronunciation

· To listen to the records many times and practice

· To listen the teacher’s drills

· To prepare for the class enjoyably

· Able to test listening and speaking



· Can learn same lesson repeatedly



· Teachers gets tired but not machine



Disadvantages of Language Lab:

· Student needed to study reading most

· Student can not repeat correctly by themselves

· Repetition of same instruction leads to boredom

· It can improve only listening and speaking

· One can’t learn all LSRW skills with Language lab software

· It requires electricity; software can’t work without it

· Somewhere we feel need of teacher for proper instruction, teacher can give more explanation and examples for better understanding we can’t expect this from language lab.

Language lab Past Present and future:

As we have already discussed past of the language lab, what is the present situation of language lab? We are living in digital era. PCs have replaced the old language labs, every student have tablet or android phones they can watch learning videos or can record their inputs and upload it. In future there will be no need of big room equipped with language lab software. One can carry lab in his/her pocket.

Works Cited

BARRUTIA, RICHARD. THE PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE OF LANGUAGE LABORATORIES. n.d. 21 February 2018. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/338842 .>.

Khampusaen, Dararat. "Past, Present and Future: From Traditional Language Laboratories to Digital Language Laboratories and Multimedia ICT Suites." n.d. 21 February 2018. <http://www.ijcim.th.org/SpecialEditions/v21nSP2/02_08_14E_Dararat.pdf>.

Kitao, Kenji. The History of Language Laboratories Origin and establishment. n.d. 21 February 2018. <https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED381020>.

Roby, Warren B. TECHNOLOGY IN THE SERVICE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING: THE CASE OF THE LANGUAGE LABORATORY. n.d. 21 February 2018. <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ebc8/687dde1b89deaf01cc53de2084de54ebc2db.pdf>.


Sense of and Ending By Julian Barnes


                                               

Sense of an Ending is a very short novel by Julian Barnes. ‘Ending’- Actually there is no Ending but to a certain extent there will be always a beginning in the Ending (I believe so). like other novels this novel has a story, a story which is based on someone’s memory, story of entangled relations, story about growing characters, a story about human psychology, how human being fabricate their own memory to console themselves. The story seems very easy but it is difficult to understand. There are many references about history and literature and one has to have knowledge about it or else he/she will close the book after reading about it.

There are some debatable questions after reading this novel, let us discuss:

What is the meaning of phrase ‘Blood Money’ in Veronica’s reply email?

Sarah Ford (Mother of veronica) left 500 dollars to Tony Webster (narrator and Protagonist) after her death. Veronica sent a mail to Tony Webster in which she has written only one word ‘Blood Money’.

There is a chain of cause and effect. Every action has reaction, Tony and veronica were in Romantic relation but after their break up veronica came in relation with Tony’s friend Adrian Finn. Adrian told about this in his letter to Tony and asked about Veronica. Tony was offended somewhere with this and portrayed veronica in wrong way and asked him to meet her mother Sarah Ford, this meeting between Adrian Finn and Sarah Ford leads them to fell in love with each other. Adrian Commits Suicide after Sarah Ford Got Pregnant. Sarah Ford believes that it is Tony because of whom Adrian came in her life,, she was happy with this relation and that is why she gave this money to him, but Veronica believes that somewhere Tony is responsible for all this, and this is the reason she wrote ‘Blood Money’.

How do you decipher the equation: b = s – v x/+ a1 or a2 + v + a1 X s = b?

Adrian Finn Wrote this equation is his Suicide note, we are not told the meaning, it is up to us that how we interpret this, As story says this could be solved like this:

a1 or a2 + v + a1 X s = b

A1= Adrian Finn

A2=Tony Webster

V= Veronica

S= Sarah Ford

B= Baby (J. Adrian)

Adrian’s diary is willed to Tony by Sarah Ford. Why did Sarah Ford own it? Why was it in the possession of Veronica?

Sarah owned the dairy of Adrian Finn because they were in relation and Veronica got this dairy because she was living with her and that could be reason that the dairy was in possession of her.

Was the mentally retarded middle aged ‘Adrian’, Tony’s friend who did not commit suicide and was suffering from trauma and thus gone mad, and was living with hidden identity?

Mentally retarded middle aged ‘Adrian’ is in actual sense son of Adrian Finn and Sarah Ford and Brother of Veronica. If he was alive then Sarah would know it, but there is no such statement by Sarah. There is no such possibility because he committed suicide in his very consciousness which can be proved through his suicide note.

How was Veronica related to Adrian, the one suffering in care-in-the-community?

There are two different shades of veronica we see within one novel. First is shown by Tony, but the real side of veronica we come to know in the end. She got nothing in the end, she did the real sacrifice. Her boyfriend turn toward her mother and now she is raising her brother; the son by her boyfriend and mother. For the sake of humanity she is taking care of her brother, J.Adrain got guardian but Veronica had no one left behind her to see her condition.

Do you see any missing block – some dot which is not getting connected with the whole or dot missing to get full sense of the novel - in the plot of this psychological thriller?

Yes there are many missing blocks which lefts the reader in ambiguity. Why Adrian did suicide? There is no such specific reason. Why Adrian would have took permission of Tony to ask for Veronica because there is no such need to do that. Why Sarah Ford is Veronica had no Good relations. Why Sarah Ford was so selfish that she ruined her daughter’s life.

Do you see any possible reason in the suicide of Adrian Finn?

Well if we see the story, Adrian’s suicide seems very Intellectual one. Which he confessed in his suicide note. He said that he was happy in his last days. He was bright student, who have seen his life in philosophical way. But some where he was escapist because he was the father of J. Adrian and he could have raised him as his son but he escaped from his responsibility by committing suicide, May be he was guilty for having relation with Sarah Ford , we don’t find any specific reason.

In the light of new revelations, how do you read character of Veronica? Instinctive, manipulative, calculating, stubborn, haughty, sacrificial, trustworthy, good Samaritan?

If we study each and every Character of the novel then veronica seems more practical and clever. In starting of the novel she was portrayed manipulative, stubborn instinctive but afterward we come to know that she has sacrificed her life behind someone else’s deed. She was time and again blamed by Tony and betrayed by her own mother and Boyfriend. She is raising her mentally retarded brother, who is the son of her boyfriend and mother, how pitiful! She doesn’t deserve this but then also she is taking burden of other’s wrong deed.

What do you mean by Unreliable Narrator? Is Tony Webster classifiable as Unreliable Narrator?

Tony is unreliable Narrator, within the text he breaks down; letter which he wrote to Adrian and Veronica is evidence of it, which reveal what actually was written in letter. When veronica returns that Letter back in the End. 

Thank you 

Tuesday, 3 April 2018

OD2017-18: Contemporary Debates and Mario Vargos Llosa

Contemporary Debates and Mario Vargos  Llosa

Liberalism simply means ‘freedom’. As Mario Vargos points in his talk concerning liberalism that “Liberalism defends some basic Ideas: Freedom, individualism, the rejection of collectivism and Nationalism- in other words, all the ideologies or doctrines that limit or annihilate freedom within Society”.
                                                        


LAUREN BACALL , the famous Hollywood star observed that “being a liberal is the best thing on earth you can be. You are welcoming to everyone when you are liberal. You do not have a small mind…I’m total, total, and total liberal and proud of it”. But today while liberalism thriving in Hollywood, lights are going out in Bollywood. Shahrukh khan, the once out spoken bearer of liberal discourse, has vowed to keep his opinion to himself and not comment on especially on political and religious issues, after blundering into too many controversies. “Unfortunately, because of the reaction I get when I answer something political or religious, I don’t think I will answer this question”, he told reporters when asked to comment on cancelation of Pakistani ghazal singer Ghulam Ali’s concert in Mumbai recently. Ditto Aamir khan, he too has gone uncharacteristically quiet after his last controversy coast him a lucrative advertising concert. (Suroor- Click here to read full article)

I do agree with his(Mario Vargos) second point as he mentioned that, “Nationalism involves a kind of Racism and Racism inevitably leads to Violence and the Suppression of Freedom”. By promoting one country or religion, you deliberately present yourself superior over other- “The not belonging group”. In between he makes a good point about literature that is, “literature and morality don’t get along. They are enemies and you have to respect literature if you believe in Freedom”.

We are living in digital era and because of social media sometimes (well, very often) reality of News gets violated. Very often we find news on social media like ‘so and so actor died’, we come to know that he/she is alive when they tweets. Same happened to me when I heard about Shree Devi’s death, I could not believe because many time I’ve came across these kinds of news about death of some stars which afterwards was proved wrong, though it was right in the case of Shree Devi. Fake news spreads very fast. We really can’t rely on one source and we have to go through some other sources to make sure whether the new is true or fake. 




Works Cited

Suroor, Hasan. "Death of Liberalism in Bollywood, The Tribune." February 10 2016. Tribune.com. Ed. Harish Khare. Indian english Daily.

Friday, 30 March 2018

To His Coy Mistress By Andrew Marvell


                                                                       

The poem is like an Ode. It is addressed to poet’s beloved. By the title it is clear that the lady is very beautiful woman and she is conscious of it. She pretends to be modest in presence of people. There is a satire on her. She perhaps wants to create sensation by attracting people. The same attitude she also maintains to her lover. Her beauty is for her lover. She has no benefits if she keeps distance from him. If they have time coyness can be approved. They can talk fr long time or they can advise hoe to walk even he would Praise for a long time.
The poet tells her that she can go to the Ganges and find Rubies. He would represent people’s complaint in the parliament as he was the MP of Humber England. Both of them have different attitude. There’s long time gone that he loved her. If she doesn’t come forward centuries would pass but people don’t live for centuries. His vegetable love grows. It means it is slow but evergreen. It is beyond and boundary of kingdom. His love is a great and deep as her love. This argument of the poet to explain her importantance of time is very short for us he says

“But at my back I always hears
Time’s winged chariot hurrying nears’’

Our life is passing quickly. Death is always following us. We can hear its steps. We would die and be in the grave. For lovers the case is same. Their grave can be near. No doubt grave is a fine and private Place but /lovers will not be able to meet. So what’s the use of it? Our body will be eaten by worms. Finally there will be dust of it. For all this the lover tells that she should leave coyness and love each other. for such a beautiful thing they can roll the world into a ball and roll over the universe so that their sweetness can be everywhere.


Stopping by woods on a snowy evening


‘Stopping by woods on a snowy evening’ is one of the most celebrated poems of Robert Frost. The first prime minister of independent India Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was so much impressed with the message of this poem that he always kept this poem on the table beneath the glass.  The poem is simple but the message which it conveys is significant. The poem is about poet to the forest, getting tempted to stay there and finally realizing that he has many works to be done by him and so he cannot step in the forest. It is a poem about the internal dilemma of a poet between love for beauty and sense of beauty. This kind of dilemma is witnessed by every person at some stage in life. We all are sometimes tempted by beauty of the nature to stop there for a longtime but the work which is to be done by us reminds us of our duty and we do not stop for a long time. Where that beautiful place is, this truth of life is conveyed by the poet through present poem.
The subject matter of the poem is simple. The port goes to a dark deep lovely forest on his horseback. It is such a beautiful place that the poet is tempted to stop there and pass that night in the forest but the horse of the poet shakes it’s head to ring thr bells which are tied to it‘s harness.  The horse wants to ask the poet whether he is mistaken in making a stay in that forest. The reason it is the darkest evening. The lake is frozen and the snowfall is there, such a gesture of his horse reminds the poet that the woods are lovely dark and deep but he has s many promises to keep. He has to perfume many duties before he sleeps in the forest and before he dies. The final message of the poem is that sense of duty in life is more important than tempting beauty. No tempting should ever prove to a hindrance on the path of duty.  

Gulliver's Travel by Johnathan Swift

                                         

Gulliver's Travel a misanthrope satire of humanity, was written in 1726 by Jonathan Swift. Captain Lemuel Gulliver, who narrates and Speaks directly to the readers from his own experience. we find Gulliver as an average man.

There are Four Different journey of Gulliver,Each of which begins with a Shipwreck and ends with either a daring escape or congenial decision that it is time for Gulliver to leave.The First Voyage is to Lilliput,the Second Voyage is to Brobdingnag and The third Voyage is to Laputa. His fourth Voyage is to the Land of the Houyhnhnms, Who are Horses endowed with Reason.

Gulliver's Travel is an Satire on Power and Politics, Through this lens, Swift hoped to "vex" his readers by offering them new insights into the game of politics and into the social follies of humans.

Moby Dick


                                         
Author:

Herman Melville was born on August 1, 1819. Herman had a troubled childhood. A bout with scarlet fever at the age of seven left his eyesight permanently damaged, and, following his father's death, the family was so poor that Herman's education was sporadic. He studied the classics in Albany and trained to be a surveyor while in Lansingburgh but had to curtail his education to earn money for the family. Despite his weak eyes, Melville was an avid reader and delighted in finding, in his late twenties, an edition of Shakespeare with print large enough to accommodate him. But his real education was at sea. He could say, with Ishmael, "a whale-ship was my Yale College and my Harvard."

Writing and Reputation

Melville's writing career, much of which was inspired by his travels, began with the publication of Typee in 1846, followed relatively shortly after by Omoo (1847). The reaction to these first two novels was encouraging enough to make Melville believe, initially, that he had a future as a professional writer. For a short time, contemporaries thought of him as one of the bright young novelists of America. These first two books are based on the author's experiences in the South Seas — Typee on his life with the cannibals and Omoo on his experiences in Tahiti. They purport to be fairly factual adventure stories allowing the audience an unusual view of Polynesian life, and each was a modest critical success.


Mardi (1849) was not. It opens with apparent realism as the narrator deserts his whaling ship, but it develops into a fantasy that readers rejected. Even Melville called it a "chartless voyage." Melville returned to the approach of his first two books in Redburn (1849), a partly autobiographical story of the reminiscences of a "Son-of-a-Gentleman" in the merchant service. Much of White Jacket (1850) is a fictional account of Melville's experiences aboard the U. S. frigate United States. The narrator exposes the tyranny and injustice of life aboard a warship, from the point of view of an enlisted man. Melville claimed that he wrote these two novels strictly for money, and they did have limited success.


Melville produced his finest book, Moby-Dick, in 1851. Only a few critics recognized the genius of the work, and Melville had serious doubts about his future career. Pierre (1852) was too ambiguous and complex for Melville's audience. The story, somewhat autobiographical, deals with a young writer who seeks strict honesty but finds only disaster for himself and those around him. Israel Potter (1855), somewhat more successful, was first published as a magazine serial. It is a rewrite of a story about an American Revolutionary veteran who returns to America after fifty years of adventures abroad, having learned to be a survivor through the application of good sense. The Piazza Tales (1856) contains some of Melville's finest writing, shorter works such as "Bartleby, the Scrivener," a consideration of the values of Wall Street; the dark "Benito Cereno"; and a work that has grown in respect over the years, "The Encantadas," a philosophical look into the Galapagos Islands. The Confidence-Man (1857), an enigmatic consideration of identity and self-deception taking place on a Mississippi River steamboat, was the last work of fiction that Melville published in his lifetime. These last works, especially The Piazza Tales, found some small audience, but Melville was terribly discouraged and withdrew from his efforts to support himself and his family through writing.


Despite his disappointment, Melville did continue to write part-time. During the final days of the Civil War, he created some moving poetry that he eventually published in Harper's New Monthly Magazine and in a volume titled Battle-Pieces (1866). A prose "Supplement" calls for decency on the part of the victorious North during the reconstruction period, a position that Abraham Lincoln espoused but did not live to bring into effect. Again, contemporary reviews were tepid.


Melville published three more books in his declining years, all at his own or a sponsor's expense. Clarel (1876) is a long poem based on his pilgrimage to the Holy Land. While ambitious, it does not attract many readers even today. John Marr and Other Sailors (1888) is a collection of poems based on Melville's life as a seaman. Timoleon and Other Ventures in Minor Verse (1891) is a collection of poetry partly based on his travels. These last two were handsome little private editions of only twenty-five copies each.


Melville left a few unpublished poems and, most notably, the fine novella Billy Budd, Foretopman, which was finally published in 1924. Although Melville was thought to be one of the finer young writers in America at the end of the 1840s, by his death he was nearly forgotten. Only one obituary noted his passing on September 28, 1891. (Harcourt)

Moby Dick:

Ishmael, the narrator, announces his intent to ship aboard a whaling vessel. He has made several voyages as a sailor but none as a whaler. He travels to New Bedford, Massachusetts, where he stays in a whalers’ inn. Since the inn is rather full, he has to share a bed with a harpooner from the South Pacific named Queequeg. At first repulsed by Queequeg’s strange habits and shocking appearance (Queequeg is covered with tattoos), Ishmael eventually comes to appreciate the man’s generosity and kind spirit, and the two decide to seek work on a whaling vessel together. They take a ferry to Nantucket, the traditional capital of the whaling industry. There they secure berths on the Pequod, a savage-looking ship adorned with the bones and teeth of sperm whales. Peleg and Bildad, the Pequod’s Quaker owners, drive a hard bargain in terms of salary. They also mention the ship’s mysterious captain, Ahab, who is still recovering from losing his leg in an encounter with a sperm whale on his last voyage.


The Pequod leaves Nantucket on a cold Christmas Day with a crew made up of men from many different countries and races. Soon the ship is in warmer waters, and Ahab makes his first appearance on deck, balancing gingerly on his false leg, which is made from a sperm whale’s jaw. He announces his desire to pursue and kill Moby Dick, the legendary great white whale who took his leg, because he sees this whale as the embodiment of evil. Ahab nails a gold doubloon to the mast and declares that it will be the prize for the first man to sight the whale. As the Pequod sails toward the southern tip of Africa, whales are sighted and unsuccessfully hunted. During the hunt, a group of men, none of whom anyone on the ship’s crew has seen before on the voyage, emerges from the hold. The men’s leader is an exotic-looking man named Fedallah. These men constitute Ahab’s private harpoon crew, smuggled aboard in defiance of Bildad and Peleg. Ahab hopes that their skills and Fedallah’s prophetic abilities will help him in his hunt for Moby Dick.


The Pequod rounds Africa and enters the Indian Ocean. A few whales are successfully caught and processed for their oil. From time to time, the ship encounters other whaling vessels. Ahab always demands information about Moby Dick from their captains. One of the ships, the Jeroboam, carries Gabriel, a crazed prophet who predicts doom for anyone who threatens Moby Dick. His predictions seem to carry some weight, as those aboard his ship who have hunted the whale have met disaster. While trying to drain the oil from the head of a captured sperm whale, Tashtego, one of the Pequod’s harpooners, falls into the whale’s voluminous head, which then rips free of the ship and begins to sink. Queequeg saves Tashtego by diving into the ocean and cutting into the slowly sinking head.


During another whale hunt, Pip, the Pequod’s black cabin boy, jumps from a whaleboat and is left behind in the middle of the ocean. He goes insane as the result of the experience and becomes a crazy but prophetic jester for the ship. Soon after, the Pequod meets the Samuel Enderby, a whaling ship whose skipper, Captain Boomer, has lost an arm in an encounter with Moby Dick. The two captains discuss the whale; Boomer, happy simply to have survived his encounter, cannot understand Ahab’s lust for vengeance. Not long after, Queequeg falls ill and has the ship’s carpenter make him a coffin in anticipation of his death. He recovers, however, and the coffin eventually becomes the Pequod’s replacement life buoy.


Ahab orders a harpoon forged in the expectation that he will soon encounter Moby Dick. He baptizes the harpoon with the blood of the Pequod’s three harpooners. The Pequod kills several more whales. Issuing a prophecy about Ahab’s death, Fedallah declares that Ahab will first see two hearses, the second of which will be made only from American wood, and that he will be killed by hemp rope. Ahab interprets these words to mean that he will not die at sea, where there are no hearses and no hangings. A typhoon hits the Pequod,illuminating it with electrical fire. Ahab takes this occurrence as a sign of imminent confrontation and success, but Starbuck, the ship’s first mate, takes it as a bad omen and considers killing Ahab to end the mad quest. After the storm ends, one of the sailors falls from the ship’s masthead and drowns—a grim foreshadowing of what lies ahead.


Ahab’s fervent desire to find and destroy Moby Dick continues to intensify, and the mad Pip is now his constant companion. The Pequod approaches the equator, where Ahab expects to find the great whale. The ship encounters two more whaling ships, the Rachel and the Delight, both of which have recently had fatal encounters with the whale. Ahab finally sights Moby Dick. The harpoon boats are launched, and Moby Dick attacks Ahab’s harpoon boat, destroying it. The next day, Moby Dick is sighted again, and the boats are lowered once more. The whale is harpooned, but Moby Dick again attacks Ahab’s boat. Fedallah, trapped in the harpoon line, is dragged overboard to his death. Starbuck must maneuver the Pequod between Ahab and the angry whale.


On the third day, the boats are once again sent after Moby Dick, who once again attacks them. The men can see Fedallah’s corpse lashed to the whale by the harpoon line. Moby Dick rams the Pequod and sinks it. Ahab is then caught in a harpoon line and hurled out of his harpoon boat to his death. All of the remaining whaleboats and men are caught in the vortex created by the sinking Pequod and pulled under to their deaths. Ishmael, who was thrown from a boat at the beginning of the chase, was far enough away to escape the whirlpool, and he alone survives. He floats atop Queequeg’s coffin, which popped back up from the wreck, until he is picked up by the Rachel, which is still searching for the crewmen lost in her earlier encounter with Moby Dick.


Works Cited


Editors, SparkNotes. "“SparkNote on Moby-Dick.”." 28 march 2018. SparkNotes.com. <http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/mobydick/>.


Harcourt, Houghton Mifflin. "Herman Melville Biography,CliffsNotes." n.d. CliffsNotes. <https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/m/mobydick/herman-melville-biography>.









All My Sons by Aurthur Miller


                                         

All My Sons is a 1947 play by Arthur Miller. It opened on Broadway at the Coronet Theatre in New York City on January 29, 1947, closed on November 8, 1949 and ran for 328 performances.It was directed by Elia Kazan (to whom it is dedicated), produced by Elia Kazan and Harold Clurman, and won the New York Drama Critics' Circle Award.


Regarded by critics as Arthur Miller’s first successful play, All My Sons presents a narrow slice of American middle-class life. The play’s context is limited: A manufacturer sells defective parts to the military and then covers up his crime by forcing his partner to take the blame. The ensuing situation, however, is where the scope of the play enlarges, culminating in the moment when the American Everyman must take a moral stand.


The drama’s spatial confines underscore the theme of the play. The Kellers’ backyard is enclosed by hedges and arbors and offers only a glimpse into the adjoining neighbors’ yards. The focus is on the individual family and its moral limitations. While the story’s premise is specific, the everyday, down-home setting of a backyard in a middle-class neighborhood in a nameless American town offers the audience a common ground of experience.


A major theme of All My Sons is that of responsibility. Before the play’s action begins, Joe Keller ducked moral responsibility by allowing cracked cylinder heads to be shipped out of his factory. He covers up and blames his partner, but he is able to justify his actions as a consequence of his obligation to his family. At the end of the play, he accepts responsibility for his crime only after his dead son Larry’s letter indicts him.


Kate Keller, too, bears responsibility for the cover-up, but she participates in it primarily as a way to keep Larry alive in her mind. If she acknowledges Joe’s guilt, she will have to acknowledge that Larry crashed. Kate represents the intuitive and the irrational. Her responsibility to her family defies—and defines—moral obligation.


The son Chris is the idealist who must come to grips with his parents’ human weaknesses. It can be said that in idolizing his father he sets up a barrier to the truth and to exploring the notion of his father’s guilt, a possibility that must have occurred to him. Chris feels a larger responsibility. Where Joe has his family in mind, Chris sees something bigger than family. It is Chris’s responsibility to make his father see that larger arena. In doing so, he brings about his father’s ultimate acceptance of responsibility and his father’s decision to take his own life in expiation for his crime.


All My Sons also addresses the material aspect of the American Dream and its effects on the soul. When Joe says that he acted as he did for Chris and his family, he represents the tension between the need to succeed materially and the responsibility of behaving ethically. Because the American economy flourished as a result of World War II, a sense of guilt could be overpowering. Chris lives this tension, and by the end of the play Joe, too, is forced to confront it. The sentiments of the play are rooted in a prewar era, but the emotional power defines the angst of postwar American society.


All My Sons, which prepares the way for Miller’s masterpiece, Death of a Salesman (1949), continues a tradition in twentieth century American drama that was established by Eugene O’Neill in Ah, Wilderness! (1933) and Long Day’s Journey into Night (1956), and by Thornton Wilder in Our Town (1938). In these plays, as in Miller’s All My Sons, the authors explore the complex dynamic between individual responsibility and family relationships.



Far from the madding crowd

                                       

Long considered one of England's foremost nineteenth-century novelists, Hardy established his reputation with the publication of Far from the Madding Crowd in 1874. It was the first of his so-called “Wessex novels,” set in a fictitious English county closely resembling Hardy's native Dorsetshire. The novel, whose title was borrowed from Thomas Gray's famous “Elegy in a Country Churchyard,” initially appeared in magazine serial form and was the first Hardy work to be widely reviewed. Variations of its rustic characters and settings were to be repeated in several future novels. The novel's protagonist, Bathsheba Everdene, would also presage other strong Hardy heroines.

Plot and Major Characters

Bathsheba Everdene, who has inherited a large farm from her uncle, becomes the center of attention for three men. After a chance meeting with a gentle sheep farmer, Gabriel Oak, Gabriel proposes marriage to Bathsheba, but is refused, as she does not consider him a proper suitor. Gabriel loses most of his herd and becomes a faithful shepherd for Bathsheba. She then meets a neighboring well-to-do farmer, Mr. Boldwood, who impresses Bathsheba. She later capriciously sends him a valentine, which excites Boldwood, and he later proposes marriage. Bathsheba puts him off, but it is assumed that she will succumb. In a subplot, a marriage between Bathsheba's servant, Fanny Robin, and the dashing Sergeant Troy is stopped because of a misunderstanding. Troy turns his attentions to Bathsheba and impresses her with his dazzling sword practice. Troy gains her hand in marriage, leaving Boldwood heartbroken. Meanwhile, the hapless Fanny dies in the workhouse, and her body is brought back to Bathsheba's farm. Bathsheba discovers the corpse of a baby, Troy's child, beside that of Fanny. Troy then disappears, and when his clothes are discovered on a beach, it is presumed that he has drowned. Boldwood reappears on the scene, and Bathsheba agrees to marry him out of a sense of remorse. Troy, however, unexpectedly returns and is killed by the distraught Boldwood, who is later tried and found insane. Bathsheba is at last ready to see the true worth of Gabriel, who has faithfully waited like the Oak of his last name, and the two are married.

Major Themes

A facile interpretation of Far from the Madding Crowd would be that true love triumphs over adversity. Since Hardy's ending, however, has often been criticized as contrived, other dominant themes in the novel should be explored. The “Wessex” setting is almost a theme in itself, with the changeless rhythms of nature and agrarian life set against the vicissitudes which confront the characters. It is noteworthy that the most positively portrayed characters are those closest to the earth, such as Gabriel and the peasants who work the soil. The timelessness of the setting is contrasted with the struggles that the characters face against time and chance. Had Bathsheba not sent the valentine, had Fanny not missed her wedding, for example, the story would have taken an entirely different path. Another important theme is that virtue will ultimately be rewarded. Bathsheba's final acceptance of Gabriel is a form of redemption for her earlier willful behavior. The development of Bathsheba's character reinforces the ideas that vanity is futile and that rebellion will ultimately be put down for the good of the community. While Bathsheba ultimately is portrayed as a reformed character, the reader may find that her old feisty self was truly more interesting.

Critical Reception

Far from the Madding Crowd was the first Hardy novel to receive considerable critical attention. It was widely reviewed in England and also marked an important stage in the growth of Hardy's international reputation; the Paris journal Revue des deux mondes, for example, made it the occasion for a long survey-article on Hardy's work to date. After the appearance (anonymously) of the first installment, the Spectator observed that “If Far from the Madding Crowd is not written by George Eliot, then there is a new light among novelists.” Critics during a number of decades have noted that the early serialization of the novel presupposed certain conventions, which could account for the melodramatic nature of many of the scenes. Study of Hardy's manuscript has shown that he had to make extensive alterations in the portions of the novel referring to Fanny Robin and her illegitimate child. Hardy was widely read and respected at the turn of the twentieth century, but a perception that his work was mostly for a popular audience discouraged serious criticism for several decades. In 1940, a seminal issue of the Southern Review devoted solely to Hardy precipitated a rebirth in Hardy criticism. Early modern critics tended to praise Far from the Madding Crowd's evocation of rural life or its universality of theme. By the 1960s and 1970s, Freudian and feminist criticism predominated. In the 1980s and 1990s, critics used a wide variety of critical approaches to Far from the Madding Crowd. While some reviewers continued to adopt a New Critical stance, most were influenced by deconstructive or New Historical techniques. A few of the themes critics exploited were the forms of love in the novel, its subtexts, Hardy's narrative techniques, the relationship of Far from the Madding Crowd to Hardy's own life experiences, and the novel's treatment of gender and power.



Heart of Darkness

 
                                       

Heart of Darkness (1899) is a novella by Polish-British novelist Joseph Conrad, about a voyage up the Congo River into the Congo Free State, in the heart of Africa, by the story's narrator Charles Marlow. Marlow tells his story to friends aboard a boat anchored on the River Thames, London, England. This setting provides the frame for Marlow's story of his obsession with the ivory trader Kurtz, which enables Conrad to create a parallel between London and Africa as places of darkness.
Plot:
Heart of Darkness centers around Marlow, an introspective sailor, and his journey up the Congo River to meet Kurtz, reputed to be an idealistic man of great abilities. Marlow takes a job as a riverboat captain with the Company, a Belgian concern organized to trade in the Congo. As he travels to Africa and then up the Congo, Marlow encounters widespread inefficiency and brutality in the Company’s stations. The native inhabitants of the region have been forced into the Company’s service, and they suffer terribly from overwork and ill treatment at the hands of the Company’s agents. The cruelty and squalor of imperial enterprise contrasts sharply with the impassive and majestic jungle that surrounds the white man’s settlements, making them appear to be tiny islands amidst a vast darkness.


Marlow arrives at the Central Station, run by the general manager, an unwholesome, conspiratorial character. He finds that his steamship has been sunk and spends several months waiting for parts to repair it. His interest in Kurtz grows during this period. The manager and his favorite, the brickmaker, seem to fear Kurtz as a threat to their position. Kurtz is rumored to be ill, making the delays in repairing the ship all the more costly. Marlow eventually gets the parts he needs to repair his ship, and he and the manager set out with a few agents (whom Marlow calls pilgrims because of their strange habit of carrying long, wooden staves wherever they go) and a crew of cannibals on a long, difficult voyage up the river. The dense jungle and the oppressive silence make everyone aboard a little jumpy, and the occasional glimpse of a native village or the sound of drums works the pilgrims into a frenzy.


Marlow and his crew come across a hut with stacked firewood, together with a note saying that the wood is for them but that they should approach cautiously. Shortly after the steamer has taken on the firewood, it is surrounded by a dense fog. When the fog clears, the ship is attacked by an unseen band of natives, who fire arrows from the safety of the forest. The African helmsman is killed before Marlow frightens the natives away with the ship’s steam whistle. Not long after, Marlow and his companions arrive at Kurtz’s Inner Station, expecting to find him dead, but a half-crazed Russian trader, who meets them as they come ashore, assures them that everything is fine and informs them that he is the one who left the wood. The Russian claims that Kurtz has enlarged his mind and cannot be subjected to the same moral judgments as normal people. Apparently, Kurtz has established himself as a god with the natives and has gone on brutal raids in the surrounding territory in search of ivory. The collection of severed heads adorning the fence posts around the station attests to his “methods.” The pilgrims bring Kurtz out of the station-house on a stretcher, and a large group of native warriors pours out of the forest and surrounds them. Kurtz speaks to them, and the natives disappear into the woods.


The manager brings Kurtz, who is quite ill, aboard the steamer. A beautiful native woman, apparently Kurtz’s mistress, appears on the shore and stares out at the ship. The Russian implies that she is somehow involved with Kurtz and has caused trouble before through her influence over him. The Russian reveals to Marlow, after swearing him to secrecy, that Kurtz had ordered the attack on the steamer to make them believe he was dead in order that they might turn back and leave him to his plans. The Russian then leaves by canoe, fearing the displeasure of the manager. Kurtz disappears in the night, and Marlow goes out in search of him, finding him crawling on all fours toward the native camp. Marlow stops him and convinces him to return to the ship. They set off down the river the next morning, but Kurtz’s health is failing fast.


Marlow listens to Kurtz talk while he pilots the ship, and Kurtz entrusts Marlow with a packet of personal documents, including an eloquent pamphlet on civilizing the savages which ends with a scrawled message that says, “Exterminate all the brutes!” The steamer breaks down, and they have to stop for repairs. Kurtz dies, uttering his last words—“The horror! The horror!”—in the presence of the confused Marlow. Marlow falls ill soon after and barely survives. Eventually he returns to Europe and goes to see Kurtz’s intended (his fiancée). She is still in mourning, even though it has been over a year since Kurtz’s death, and she praises him as a paragon of virtue and achievement. She asks what his last words were, but Marlow cannot bring himself to shatter her illusions with the truth. Instead, he tells her that Kurtz’s last word was her name.


Characters:


Charlie Marlow a 32 year-old man who has "followed the sea." Marlow's story of his voyage up the Congo River constitutes almost all of Conrad's novel. He pilots the steamboat sent to relieve Kurtz and is shocked by what he sees the European traders have done to the natives.


Kurtz an ivory trader for the Company. Kurtz works out of the Inner Station and is remarkably effective at acquiring ivory. A well-educated European, he is described as a "universal genius" and begins his work in the Congo as part of a virtuous mission. However, while in the jungle, he sets himself up as a god to the natives. By the time Marlow reaches him, he is emaciated and dying.


The Manager Working out of the Central Station, the Manager oversees the Company's activities in the Congo. (He is based on a real person, Camille Delcommune.) The Manager is able to inspire uneasiness in others; Marlow later figures out that he was responsible for the wreck of his steamboat. The Manager fears that Kurtz is trying to steal his job.


The Accountant Also working out of the Central Station, the Accountant somehow manages to wear spotless clothes in the sweltering heat and complains about the groans of a dying man who is brought to his office for fear of being distracted and making clerical errors in the Company's books. He also confides to Marlow some of the Company's shady business practices.


The Brickmaker Although his name suggests the nature of his position, the Brickmaker does not make any bricks because of a shortage of materials. When Marlow meets the Brickmaker at the Central Station, Marlow suspects that he is "pumping" him for information about the Company's plans.


The Harlequin a Russian freelance trader who meets Kurtz in the jungle. He admires Kurtz immensely, telling Marlow, "This man has enlarged my mind."


Kurtz's Native Mistress Kurtz's native mistress. She is very protective of Kurtz and leads a chant on the bank of the river when Kurtz leaves the Inner Station. She dresses in bright colors.


The "Pilgrims" European agents at the Central Station waiting for a chance to be promoted to trading posts, so they can then earn percentages of the ivory they ship back.


The Helmsman a native crewman on Marlow's steamboat. He is killed by a spear during an attack on the boat.


The Doctor When in Brussels, Marlow is examined by the Doctor at the Company's headquarters. He is interested in the effects of the jungle (and the lack of restraint it offers its inhabitants) on European minds.


Marlow's Aunt Using her influence with the wife of a high Company official, she helps Marlow get his post as a steamboat pilot for the Company.


Kurtz's Intended a demure and mourning young woman; Marlow visits her after he returns to Europe and lies to her about her fiancée's last words. She is dressed in black.


The Narrator an unnamed man on board the Nellie who relates Marlow's story to the reader.


Colonialism and imperialism in heart of Darkness


Marlow's story in Heart of Darkness takes place in the Belgian Congo, the most notorious European colony in Africa for its greed and brutalization of the native people. In its depiction of the monstrous wastefulness and casual cruelty of the colonial agents toward the African natives, Heart of Darkness reveals the utter hypocrisy of the entire colonial effort. In Europe, colonization of Africa was justified on the grounds that not only would it bring wealth to Europe; it would also civilize and educate the "savage" African natives. Heart of Darkness shows that in practice the European colonizers used the high ideals of colonization as a cover to allow them to viciously rip whatever wealth they could from Africa.


Unlike most novels that focus on the evils of colonialism, Heart of Darkness pays more attention to the damage that colonization does to the souls of white colonizers than it does to the physical death and devastation unleashed on the black natives. Though this focus on the white colonizers makes the novella somewhat unbalanced, it does allow Heart of Darkness to extend its criticism of colonialism all the way back to its corrupt source, the "civilization" of Europe.






Works Cited


Ben and justin. Litcharts. <https://www.litcharts.com/lit/heart-of-darkness/themes/colonialism>.


Hillegass, Clifton Keith. cliffsnotes. <https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/h/heart-of-darkness/character-list>.


Sparknotes . <http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/heart/summary/>.













Tuesday, 13 March 2018

Stop telling Sharmeens and Adigas to photoshop reality

                                                 
Here is my response to the article given as a part of online discussion. to read full article👉 click here
                                                         Truth wins: The buzz around Sharmeen’s film has prompted Nawaz Sharif to say that the practice of honour killings in Pakistan should come to an end
People who belongs to East or say Third world country would like to do postcolonial study, because once they were colonized by British People, so whenever they will come up with something written about backwardness of India, people will feel offended. Nowadays feeling offended became a national hobby. People will love the book which sings the songs of the glory or beauty of India but they will raise their eyebrows when Writer like Arvind Adiga writes something which represents dark side of India. People criticized the movie Slum dog millionaire and government of India tried to put ban on documentary on Nirbhaya by Leslee Udwin. Main argument about both movie and documentary was that it was made by white person who will see only bad things, then what about the writers who belongs to same land and for them there is different India. People don’t want to confront reality that is the main predicament.

As Micheal J Fox said “Acceptance doesn’t mean resignation; it means understanding that something is what it is and that there’s got to be a way through it”. As writer of this article rightly said that “Of course western interest can be narrow in its focus and agenda driven. But whose is not? tell our stories truthfully And if we find that these stories shame us, then we must do something about them. But for those of us still fixated on the ‘image’ issue, it’s quite simple really: you want better PR? Improve the product.” I completely agree with her words.

Monday, 12 March 2018

Da Vinci Code movie review




This blog is part of my classroom activity, after watching movie here is my answers to the questions asked in this blog.

As Dan Brown has stated that his books are not anti Christian, ‘he is on constant spiritual journey himself’- this thing we can find in the character of Robert Langdon and Sophie Neuve. Right from the beginning they were in search of truth. As Robert narrates how he had a near death experience and he said that god saved him; whereas on the same hand Sophie also had faced a major car accident and she was the only person who survived as one alive , but still she doesn't believe in god. Author presents this two contrary characters Meanwhile on other hand Silas who is blind follower of Christianity and in a name of religion kills other people, Bezu fache is also believer of Opes Dei; these two characters are blind folded in religious faith. Aringarosa is doing wrong religious practice. Author juxtaposes this different character and presents different definition of faith. Robert’s faith is still on Christ after knowing about the sarcophagus of Mary Magdalene; this how we find introspection and exploration of faith.


Stories of genesis are written, then rewritten and edited several times and narrative of paradise lost follows the stories of genesis. Dan Brown’s Da Vinci Code is more convincing to the contemporary young mind, rather believing in such stories one should question their faith; question remains important than answer.

John Milton’s Paradise Lost have the same story like bible, but Eve in Milton’s Paradise Lost questions and argues; she is curious (rather becomes more rational) to know why god has prohibited fruit of knowledge. She is questioning god’s command and also human’s faith on god has questioned. In a same way in Da Vinci Code human’s faith on religion is questioned with the story of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene. It can damage the faith of people on religion in which they have believed from ages. I would say that this kind of Narration leads us to see different side of story; people become more rational rather believing in such narration made up by different narrator without any evidences. Story of Da Vinci Code has evidences which make us believe that story of Mary Magdalene and Christ is right.


Ophelia’s Character is marginalized in Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet; she is mere an object, there is no other importance her Caharcter. Harmoine Garnger is smarter than Harry and Ron then also she needs their help to rescue her from dangerous situation. She is more rational and logical than Harry and Ron; but in last two parts her mind stops working as it sparks with an idea in her mind in previous series and Ron was shown Smarter when it comes to destroy Horcrux. Her Knowledge is shown only bookish knowledge, she comes under the aura of Harry but her Character is quite Justifiable. In starting of the movie Da Vinci Code Sophie Neuve seems to be more rational and mentally strong than Robert Langdon. But some time she acted dumb.

Movie like OH MY GOD and PK tries to question established notions about religion. In Oh My God protagonist do not believe in god by saying that he has not seen the god. In Pk Protagonist has tested many things to meet the god but ends up everything because god never appeared to him and exposed persons who were doing wrong religious practice in a name of religion.

If we do traditional reading of novel ‘The Da Vinci Code’ Leigh Teabing will claim the position of protagonist. He is rational, who is an atheist. Teabing’s motive was not money but mankind. He says to Robert Langdon that “all the oppression of the poor and powerless of those different skin of women, you can put an end to all of that, you must explode the truth onto the word”.









Here is my view on videos about existentialism in 👉this blog 

Answer:1
I’m impressed by these thoughts…

Video: 1) Existentialist mainly focuses on one’s passion, freedom and individuality. Believing in god is called philosophical suicide because in doing so you are picking an easy way out.

Video: 2) I like the thought here: beginning to think is beginning to understand

Video: 3) when religious people are faced with uselessness of reasoning and they can’t hesitate to say there must be something beyond reason, but when an absurd mind reason is useless and absurd man knows, there is no place for hope and warning like if man had no eternal consciousness, what would life be but despair ? Camus says that “seeking what is truth is not seeking what is desirable”.

Video: 4) Dadaism pushes you to questioning that values which others have created, it is against existing values and rules and Hugo Ball’s thought that “ I don’t want the words that other people have invented”.

Video: 5) It is you who should judge every value and chose your own meaning in life. And once you have done that then take responsibility for the choice you have made and accept the consequences of it.

Video: 6) Existentialism and Nihilism are totally different. Both share the basic view but what makes these both different is the conclusion they draw .Nihilism leads to nihilation and existentialism leads to fulfill life.

Video: 7) Humans were not ‘designed’. We come into this world lacking a pre-determined essence. It’s our ability to make free choices give us the chance to sculpt a unique essence for ourselves joining the course of our lifetime.

Video: 8) live the life in a way you want to live and Nietzsche’s Ubermensch can do anything.

Video: 9) I like existentialism because it accepts the way you are. Accept you with your faults and abilities.

Video: 10) If person have to choose anyone thing, there no answers until the man choose one for himself. No moral theory could help him inside because no one else’s advice could lead him to a decision that was truly authentic.

Answer: 2

I like video no 8 very easy way of explaining of existentialism and ubermensch and video no: 10 our existence- our birth happens first then it’s up to us to do determine who we are.

Answer: 3

This is the second time we have done flipped learning. I became more clear about what existentialism really means. I have done this activity threw mobile phone so there were no caption and for that time and again I have to replay video to understand what the speaker have said, It examines your listening skill and improves your listening skills.
Thank you 

Breath - a Play

                 

This blog is part of my classroom activity to view activity click here

Here is my interpretations of The Play Breath by Samuel Backett

Video 4 Modern interpretation.

In This video The first image is of Rising sun which signifies Human existence, then toys ,small shoe which signifies early childhood then we see sckating shoe and again pair of shoe which shows Teenage, then we can see headphone and book and clock which shows young age after that we see debit card and check book which shows that person is now earning. Next we see photo dairy photos from childhood to young age and besides that there is medicine which signifies person have become old who recalling his early days. Then we see sunset which says about person's death.
Now we see that from beginning person take birth, grows up, get the job achieves many things but after all these things ultimately person dies and nothing lefts behind. There is everything but there is nothing to Do. Nothingness in human life in which existentialist believes is very well captured here.

Who we are ?
what is the purpose for our leaving ?

Questions on Human existence is reflected here. In The Play waiting for Godot by Samuel Backett Vladimir and Estragon waiting for the person named Godot; and in process of waiting to pass the time they are talking trivial kind of things ( Doing something until the death comes) -somehow we can connect this thing Here also.

Thank you.

The Waste Land



                                            







1)Frederic Nietzsche was a German philosopher who gave the term ' Übermensch', which means superhuman, a human being with remarkable abilities. Say for example Mahavira swami who was born in royal family and then left his home in pursuit of knowledge. He lived in the 5th-century BC contemporaneously with the Buddha. Both were normal human being and both have practiced intense meditation. Though they were not gods but were having super human quality as compared to other humans. one become leader in Jainism and another become leader in Buddhism but with passing of time they were considered as god. Eliot is regressive as compared to Nietzsche, he have used many myth in his poem waste land, there is nothing wrong in being regressive because people learns from past. If people have done something wrong in past they can recover or learns not to repeat same thing in present. Eliot gave example of myth in the context of present.

2) .Both Freud and Eliot are contemporaries and both were having in different perception. In waste land Eliot majorly talked about sexual perversion and spiritual degradation, where on other hand what Freud said was-“giving free vent to the repressed 'primitive instinct' lead us to happy and satisfied life” it will give satisfied and happy life but it would also bring chaos in society. And what Eliot believes that 'salvation of man lies in the preservation of the cultural tradition'- nothing wrong in following the tradition and cultures if it help to stop creating chaos in society.

3) There are many Indian thought in waste land. Eliot was well read scholar and he includes Indian Upanishad also in his poems.

Ganga was sunken, and the limp leaves
Waited for rain, while the black clouds
Gathered far distant, over Himavant.

By these Eliot refers to wisdom of India for spiritual salvation of modern humanity.
Eliot uses three DA, which he has taken from " Brihadaranyaka Upanishad".


DA
Datta: what have we given?
My friend, blood shaking my heart
The awful daring of a moment’s surrender
Which an age of prudence can never retract
By this, and this only, we have existed
Which is not to be found in our obituaries
Or in memories draped by the beneficent spider
Or under seals broken by the lean solicitor
In our empty rooms
DA
Dayadhvam: I have heard the key
Turn in the door once and turn once only
We think of the key, each in his prison
Thinking of the key, each confirms a prison
Only at nightfall, aethereal rumours

Revive for a moment a broken Coriolanus
DA
Damyata: The boat responded
Gaily, to the hand expert with sail and oar
The sea was calm, your heart would have responded
Gaily, when invited, beating obedient
To controlling hands



Datta means to give; not only charity but giving oneself for some Nobel cause.
Dayadhvam means to sympathies yourself with the sorrows and suffering from other
Damayanta means self control, control over one’s passions and desire ( sexual desire).


Shantih shantih shantih - this last line is about ultimate peace which every human being is craving for. This can be considered as universal human law.

Thank you....

Northrop Frye: The Archetypes of Literature




                                               


1) If we see dictionary meaning of Archetypal literature it means original model or ideal example. And literal meaning says that archetype denotes recurrent narratives design, pattern of actions, character types, themes dreams and social rituals. Say for example there are many serials were made from the story of Mahabharata, there are many stories myths also we found. All these things were made up out of one thing and that is original story. So here the original model or archetype is ‘Mahabharata.’

2)Physics is systematic study of nature and criticism is a systematic study of literature. Literature cannot be taught directly but criticism can be taught.

3)History deals with the actions happened in past. Whereas Philosophy deals with ideas.

4)The inductive method is a process of backing up. And Frye gives example of grave digging scene. At first we see that from Yorick soliloquy We would find philosophy of life and Hamlet declaires his love for Ophelia, but if we see deeply then we will come to know that these all are connected with each other. Because after these scene we feel somewhere that ‘ some thing is in the air’.
5)
ાગણનું એક ફૂલ આપો, કે લાલ મોરા
કેસૂડો કામણગારો જી લોલ.

વનની વાટે તે વ્હાલા એક ફૂલ દીઠું લોલ,
એકલ હો ડાળ, એક એકલડું મીઠું લોલ,
મેં તો દીઠું દીઠું ને મન મોહ્યું, કે લાલ મોરા,
કેસૂડો કામણગારો જી લોલ.

ઉત્તરના વાયરાએ ઢંઢોળ્યાં વન લોલ,
જાગી વસંત, કૈંક જાગ્યાં જીવન લોલ,
મેં તો સુખડાંની સેજ તજી જોયું, કે લાલ મોરા,
કેસૂડો કામણગારો જી લોલ.

રૂપલિયા વાટ મારી રૂપલિયા આશ લોલ,
સોનલા સૂરજ તારા, સોનલ ઉજાસ લોલ,
તારી વેણુમાં વેણ મેં પરોવ્યું, કે લાલ મોરા,
કેસૂડો કામણગારો જી લોલ.

-સુન્દરમ્

Here in these poem there is description of spring.spring symbolizes the defeat of winter and darkness.

Mathew Arnold: The Study of Poetry



                                   

Arnold’s idea on ‘disinterestedness’ and ‘detachment’ is relevant idea in present time. A critic should be impartial when he/she passes his/her views on any piece of work. It should not matter for a critic that who is writes.
Arnold's Touchstone method sound irrelevant in present time; because comparing works of two different centuries are not at all justifying. Because with the passing of the time people's and writer's view may change according to their time and it would also reflect in literature of their time. Every world have their own values; say for example we have writer like Kalidas in our literature and Shakespeare in English literature. Both are great writers and their world have their own values.
Second is about morality. It seems that Arnold is in favor of ‘Art for life sake’. It is not necessary all time to give moral lessons out of every work. Art should not have boundaries and we can't handcuffed it with the word ‘Morality’.

Review on Short Learning Videos on Wordsworth's Preface to Lyrical Ballads






                                                       




1 ) It's about technique  of writing, which makes difference between these two terms. when we talk about classicism they considered as the ruling guiding principles.they believe in intellect and restrain. where as romanticism did not believe in any kind of restrain, they believe in freedom.Imagination is guiding principle.

2) Wordsworth say what is poet rather than who is poet,he is man speaking to man, he is like any other human being but he differs from them in degree,for example he is endowed with more lively sensibility .everybody has sensibilities but he is endowed in more lively sensibility, he has more enthusiasms,he has more tenderness.

3)  poetic diction means choice of words, and according to Wordsworth poetic diction means a language  as really used by men. a  language which is spoken by an ordinary man."Micheal " is best example to proof his point right.

4) definition of poetry which was given by Wordsworth is something like this - Poetry is finer spirit of all knowledge which teaches moral lesson with feelings

5) daffodils it  poem by wordsworth, which has four stanzas; first three  in past and last in present.in first three stanza there is spontaneous overflow of feeling and and in last stanza poet recollects the memory during lining on couch,where we remembered his last line of definition "recollect it tranquility."

Difference between poem and poerty












difference between poem and poetry:- poem is the forms of the imagination. a verbal expression of that activity,and poetic activity is an activity of the imagination. while the poetry is a kind of activity which can be engaged in by this we can apply here Coleridge's view on poetry that "poetry of the highest kind my exist without meter and even without the contrast distinguishing objects of a poem".
In simple way we can say that poem means:- a hymn(a song,of praise or worship) with no regular meter.
and Poem means:- a literary piece written in verse ( a poetic form with regular meter and a fixed rhyme scheme. according to Coleridge,the poem is distinguished from prose composition by its immediate object. the immediate object of prose is to give truth and that of poem is to please.

Dryden's Essay: Of Dramatic Poesy: review of Short Video Lectures




This blog is part of my classroom activity to view activity click here





1) First video: After watching first video we come to know that why Dr Samuel Johnson called Dryden ‘The father of English criticism. Father in a sense because he was the parson after Aristotle who is giving us a very well formed definition of a play. A neoclassical critic because his influences are say Aristotle Longinus the classical critics, neo classical scholars, critics are influenced by the classical minds. And also give the definition of play.

2) In second video : Dryden is neo classical poet, the age of Dryden comes after the Elizabethan age. As a poet Dryden come to realize that he needed a kind of sanitized, Dramatic poesy meaning the poetical art form of drama so he looks back to his connecting the entire critical and history of criticism and history of dramatic texts.

3) Video 3: Dryden’s definition of play ‘A play ought to be just a lively means there is no a artificiality. It should be very natural just a lively image so it should not be artistically considered. Then representation of human nature is also important. It means not only copy or imitation it is presentation and representation.

4) Video 4:there was discussion about the superiority of ancient and moderns. Lisideius argued that French drama is superior to English dramas while Eugenius favours the Morden over the ancient – argued that the Morden exceed the ancients because of having learned and profited from their example.

5) Video 5: Dryden himself begins this tradition, writing plays in verse. Neander supports the writing of serious plays, tragedy in verse. Where as Crites says that nothing is just and lively can be so artificial that it takes primes. There are some objections and some of them are quite hilarious for example: would anybody scold one's servant in rhyme or there party would that be in rhyme. he says that write it in verse take away the naturalness. Dryden seems to have moved on not followed his own strongest character Neander rhyme advocating verse.

6) Video:6 meander stands for the use of rhymed verse. crites says that rhyme is unnatural to the play. He says that it is not a proper way to carry ‘just and lively’ image of human nature. Crites says that-“no man without premeditation speaks in rhyme”. So this is the solid ground where time argues that it should not be use. Crites also argued that blank verse should not also carry just and lively human image.

Movie review of Hamlet Movie







1) Movie is faithful to the original play because dialogues are from real text and all scenes are there in the movie. Movie combined all scene and because this movie is very long. Though it is a movie so setting is different, movie has Victorian setting. Young Fortinbras also have shown in beginning in costume it is Victorian setting.


2) After watching the movie we don’t feel pity toward hamlet and my perception toward Ophelia also changed after watching this movie .in the movie Ophelia’s character is portrayed very strong, Gertrude character also different in the movie because she seems to be happy in her new life with Claudius.


3) Yes I feel ‘aesthetic delight’ when hamlet was pretending as if he is mad.


4) Yes I feel catharsis when Ophelia gone made. In her obedience towards her father and love for hamlet she gets nothing in return .her father was using her as means and hamlet rejected her by saying that he don’t love her .it seems that she has not her own existence.


5) Yes movie helps us to understand the play in a better way. Visual play vital role to understand any movie which is based on the play.


6) The movement I would like to cherish lifetime is so when Fortinbras comes and seat on the throne. It says that revenge comes back with revenge .when Claudius kills father hamlet and comes on throne, Hamlet kills Claudius and takes the revenge of father’s death but he also died because leartes want to take revenge of his father and sisters death and he injures him with poisoned sword. At the end Fortinbras also wanted to take revenge of his father’s death but he found everyone is dead.


7) If I was the director I would keep settings as it is. And I would keep Gertrude’s character clear rather than complicated.


8) This signifies that when story starts Hamlets Empire was there but in the end it was destroyed by soldier and Fortinbras comes on throne which shows that now no one was there from his family to rule over the Denmark.


9) While studying the play through movie I found formalist approach more suitable because there was trap metaphor for example “I am too much in sun”.


10) I would like to apply psychological approach here because Hamlet was a man of thinking, he was always in a state of ‘To be or not to be’. Nothing is good or bad but thinking makes it.